Anales de la RANM

20 A N A L E S R A N M R E V I S T A F U N D A D A E N 1 8 7 9 S U P L E M E N T O APARICIÓN Y DESARROLLO DEL LENGUAJE HUMANO José E. García-Albea An RANM · Año 2018 · 135(02) · Supl.01 · páginas 9 XV Curso de fundamentos moleculares de la Medicina a 21 1. Chomsky N. Knowledge of language. New York, NY: Praeger; 1986. 2. Chomsky N. Rules and representations. Oxford, UK: Blackwell; 1980. 3. Chomsky N. Language and problems of knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1988. 4. Hauser MD, Chomsky N, Fitch WT. The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 2002; 298 (5598): 1569-1579. 5. Chomsky N. The minimalist program. Cam- bridge, MA: MIT Press; 1995. 6. Chomsky N. Approaching UG from be- low. En: Sauerland U, Gärtner HM, eds. Interfaces+Recursion = Language? Berlin: Mouton; 2007, p. 1-29. 7. Chomsky N. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1965. 8. Fodor JA. The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1983. 9. Garfield JL, ed. Modularity in knowledge repre- sentation and natural language understanding . Cambridge. MA: MIT Press; 1987. 10. De Almeida R, Gleitman LR, eds. On concepts, modules, and language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2018. 11. Lenneberg EH. Biological foundations of lan- guage. New York, NY: Wiley; 1967. 12. Di Sciullo MA, Boeckx C, eds. The biolinguis- tic enterprise. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2011. 13. Friederici AD. Language in our brain. Cambrid- ge, MA: MIT Press; 2017. 14. Gallistel CR. (2018). The neurobiological bases for the computational theory of mind. En: De Almeida, R, Gleitman LR, eds. On concepts, modules, and language. Oxford, UK: OUP; 2018, p. 275-296. 15. Berwick EC, Friederici AD, Chomsky N, Bol- huis JJ (2013). Evolution, brain, and the nature of language. Trends Cogn Sci. 2013; 17 (2):89- 98. 16. Chomsky N. Lectures on Government and Bin- ding. Dordretch: Foris; 1981. 17. Mehler J, Dupoux E. Naître humain. Paris: Edi- tions Odile Jacob; 1990. 18. Pinker S. The language instinct. New York, NY: Morrow; 1994. 19. Harley TA. The psychology of language: from data to theory. New York, NY: Psychology Press; 2008. 20. Fernández, EM, Cairns HS. Fundamentals of Psycholinguistics. Malden, MA: Wiley; 2011. 21. Kisilevsky BS, Hains SM, Lee K, Xie X, Huang H, Ye HH, et al. Effects of experience on fetal voice recognition. Psychol Sci. 2003; 14 (3): 220-224. 22. Kisilevsky BS, Hains SM, Brown CA, Lee CT, Coperthwaite B, Stutzman SS, et al. Fetal sen- sitivity to properties of maternal speech and language. Infant Behav Dev. 2009; 32 (1): 59-71. 23. Mehler J, Jusczyk PW, Lambertz G, Halsted G, Bertoncini J, Amiel-Tison C. A precursor of language acquisition in young infants. Cogni- tion. 1988; 29 (2): 143-178. 24. Eimas P, Siqueland ER, Juscyk PW, Vigorito J. Speech perception in infants. Science. 1971; 171 (3968): 303-306. 25. Mehler J. Connaître par désapprentissages. En: Piattelli-Palmarini M, Morin E, eds. L’unité de l’homme. Paris: Le Seuil; 1974, p. 287-299. 26. Mehler J. Unlearning: Dips and drops – A theo- ry of cognitive development. En: Bever TG, ed. Regressions in development: Basic phenomena and theoretical alternatives. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA; 1982, p. 133-152. 27. Werker J, Tees RC. Cross-language speech per- ception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behav Dev. 1984; 7 (1): 49-63. 28. Pettito LA, Holowka S, Sergio LE, Levy B, Ostry DJ. Baby hands that move to the rhythm of lan- guage: Hearing babies acquiring sign languages babble silently on the hands. Cognition. 2004; 93 (1): 43-73. 29. Landau B, Gleitman LR. Language and experi- ence: Evidence from a blind child. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1985. 30. Curtiss S. Genie: A psycholinguistic study of a modern-day “wild child”. New York, NY: Aca- demic Press; 1977. 31. Skeide MA, Friederici AD. The ontogeny of the cortical language network. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2016; 17 (5): 323-332. 32. Berwick EC, Chomsky N. Why only us. Lan- guage and evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2016. 33. Gould SJ, Lewontin R. The sprandels of San Marco and the panglossian paradigm: A cri- tique of the adaptationist programme. Proc R Soc London B. 1979; 205 (1161): 581-598. 34. Gould SJ, Vrba ES. Exaptation: A missing name in the science of form. Paleobiology. 1982; 8 (1): 4-15. 35. Fodor JA, Piattelli-Palmarini M. What Darwin got wrong. London, UK: Profile Books; 2010. 36. King MC, Wilson A. Evolution at two levels in humans and chimpanzees. Science. 1975; 188 (4184): 107-116. 37. Fisher SE, Lai SL, Monaco AP. Deciphering the genetic basis of speech and language disorders. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2003; 26 (1): 57-80. 38. Hayes C. The ape in our house. New York, NY: Harper; 1951. 39. Hayes K, Hayes C. Imitation in a home-raised chimpanzee. J Comp Physiol Psychol.1952; 45 (5): 450-459. 40. Gardner RA, Gardner BT. Teaching sign lan- guage to a chimpanzee. Science. 1969; 165 (3894): 664-672. 41. Patterson F. The gestures of a gorila: Language acquisition in another pongid. Brain and Lan- guage. 1978; 5 (1): 56-71. 42. Terrace H. Nim: A chimpanzee who learned sign language. New York, NY: Washington Square Press; 1981. 43. Premack D, Premack AJ. The mind of an ape. New York, NY: Norton; 1983. 44. Rumbaugh D, ed. Language learning in a chim- panzee. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA; 1977. 45. Savage-Rumbaugh, S., Lewin, R. The ape at the brink of the human mind. New York, NY: Wiley; 1994. BIBLIOGRAFÍA

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy ODI4MTE=