Anales de la RANM

296 A N A L E S R A N M R E V I S T A F U N D A D A E N 1 8 7 9 PROYECTO NUCLEOMA 4D José Miguel García Sagredo An RANM · Año 2019 · número 136 (03) · páginas 292 a 297 2. Cremer T, Cremer C . Rise, fall and resurrection of chromosome territories: a historical perspec- tive. Part I. The rise of chromosome territories. Eur J Histochem. 2006;50(3):161-176. 3. Satzinger H . T, Boweri M.: Chromosomes and cytoplasm in heredity and development. Nat Rev Genet. 2008;9(3):231-238. 4. Stack SM, Brown DB, Dewey WC . Visualiza- tion of interphase chromosomes. J Cell Sci. 1977;26:281-299. 5. Cremer T, Cremer C, Schneider T, Baumann H, Hens L, Kirsch-Volders M . Analysis of chromo- some positions in the interphase nucleus of Chi- nese hamster cells by laser-UV-microirradiation experiments. Hum Genet. 1982;62(3):201-209. 6. Cremer C, Cremer T . Induction of chromosome shattering by ultraviolet light and caffeine: the influence of different distributions of photole- sions. Mutat Res. 1986;163(1):33-40. 7. Cremer C, Cremer T, Gray JW . Induction of chromosome damage by ultraviolet light and ca- ffeine: correlation of cytogenetic evaluation and flow karyotype. Cytometry. 1982;2(5):287-290. 8. Cremer T, Landegent J, Bruckner A, et al. De- tection of chromosome aberrations in the human interphase nucleus by visualization of specific target DNAs with radioactive and non-radioac- tive in situ hybridization techniques: diagnosis of trisomy 18 with probe L1.84. Hum Genet. 1986;74(4):346-352. 9. Zirbel RM, Mathieu UR, Kurz A, Cremer T, Li- chter P . Evidence for a nuclear compartment of transcription and splicing located at chromo- some domain boundaries. Chromosome Res. 1993;1(2):93-106. 10. Wijnaendts Van Resandt RWM, H. J.; Kaplan, B. R.; Davoust, J.; Stelzer, E. H. K.; Stricker R. Opti- cal fluorescence microscopy in three dimensions: microtomoscopy. J Microscopy. 1985;138: 35-42. 11. Lichter P, Cremer T, Borden J, Manuelidis L, Ward DC . Delineation of individual human chromoso- mes in metaphase and interphase cells by in situ suppression hybridization using recombinant DNA libraries. Hum Genet. 1988;80(3):224-234. 12. Croft JA, Bridger JM, Boyle S, Perry P, Teague P, Bickmore WA . Differences in the localization and morphology of chromosomes in the human nucleus. J Cell Biol. 1999;145(6):1119-1131. 13. Boyle S, Gilchrist S, Bridger JM, Mahy NL, Ellis JA, Bickmore WA . The spatial organization of human chromosomes within the nuclei of nor- mal and emerin-mutant cells. Hum Mol Genet. 2001;10(3):211-219. 14. Cremer T, Cremer C . Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells. Nat Rev Genet. 2001;2(4):292- 301. 15. Solovei I, Kreysing M, Lanctot C, et al. Nu- clear architecture of rod photoreceptor cells adapts to vision in mammalian evolution. Cell. 2009;137(2):356-368. 16. Dundr M, Misteli T . Functional architecture in the cell nucleus. Biochem J. 2001;356(Pt 2):297- 310. 17. Bartova E, Kozubek S, Jirsova P, et al. Nuclear structure and gene activity in human differentia- ted cells. J Struct Biol. 2002;139(2):76-89. 18. Cremer T, Kupper K, Dietzel S, Fakan S . Higher order chromatin architecture in the cell nucleus: on the way from structure to function. Biol Cell. 2004;96(8):555-567. 19. Parada LA, McQueen PG, Munson PJ, Misteli T . Conservation of relative chromosome posi- tioning in normal and cancer cells. Curr Biol. 2002;12(19):1692-1697. 20. Parada L, Misteli T . Chromosome positioning in the interphase nucleus. Trends Cell Biol. 2002;12(9):425-432. 21. Paz N, Felipe-Blanco I, Royo F, et al. Expression of the DYRK1A gene correlates with its 3D positio- ning in the interphase nucleus of Down syndrome cells. Chromosome Res. 2015;23(2):285-298. 22. Cremer M, Kupper K, Wagler B, et al. Inheritan- ce of gene density-related higher order chroma- tin arrangements in normal and tumor cell nu- clei. J Cell Biol. 2003;162(5):809-820. 23. Cremer T, Cremer M, Hubner B, et al. The 4D nucleome: Evidence for a dynamic nuclear lands- cape based on co-aligned active and inactive nu- clear compartments. FEBS Lett. 2015;589(20 Pt A):2931-2943. 24. Shi Y, Su XB, He KY, Wu BH, Zhang BY, Han ZG . Chromatin accessibility contributes to si- multaneous mutations of cancer genes. Sci Rep. 2016;6:35270. 25. Kozubek S, Lukasova E, Mareckova A, et al. The topological organization of chromosomes 9 and 22 in cell nuclei has a determinative role in the induction of t(9,22) translocations and in the pathogenesis of t(9,22) leukemias. Chromosoma. 1999;108(7):426-435. 26. Osborne CS, Chakalova L, Mitchell JA, et al. Myc dynamically and preferentially relocates to a transcription factory occupied by Igh. PLoS Biol. 2007;5(8):e192. 27. Mota-Gomez I, Lupianez DG . A (3D-Nuclear) Space Odyssey: Making Sense of Hi-C Maps. Ge- nes (Basel). 2019;10(6). 28. Kempfer R, Pombo A . Methods for mapping 3D chromosome architecture. Nat Rev Genet. 2019. 29. Rowley MJ, Corces VG . Organizational princi- ples of 3D genome architecture. Nat Rev Genet. 2018;19(12):789-800. 30. Chakalova L, Debrand E, Mitchell JA, Osborne CS, Fraser P . Replication and transcription: sha- ping the landscape of the genome. Nat Rev Ge- net. 2005;6(9):669-677. 31. Matharu N, Ahituv N . Minor Loops in Major Folds: Enhancer-Promoter Looping, Chroma- tin Restructuring, and Their Association with Transcriptional Regulation and Disease. PLoS Genet. 2015;11(12):e1005640. 32. Lupianez DG, Kraft K, Heinrich V, et al. Disrup- tions of topological chromatin domains cause pathogenic rewiring of gene-enhancer interac- tions. Cell. 2015;161(5):1012-1025. 33. Lupianez DG, Spielmann M, Mundlos S . Brea- king TADs: How Alterations of Chromatin Domains Result in Disease. Trends Genet. 2016;32(4):225-237. 34. Valton AL, Dekker J . TAD disruption as oncogenic driver. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2016;36:34-40. 35. Ho SS, Urban AE, Mills RE . Structural variation in the sequencing era. Nat Rev Genet. 2019.