Anales de la RANM

54 A N A L E S R A N M R E V I S T A F U N D A D A E N 1 8 7 9 CIRUGÍA UROONCOLÓGICA EN EL PACIENTE ANCIANO Artiles Medina A, et al. An RANM. 2022;139(01): 43- 55 21. Sancı A, Özkaya MF, Oguz ES et al. Periopera- tive adverse events and functional outcomes fo- llowing open and robot-assisted prostatectomy in patients over age 70. Int J Clin Pract. 2021; 75(11): e14754. 22. Capogrosso P, Barret E, Sánchez-Salas R et al. Oncological and functional outcomes of elderly men treated with HIFU vs. minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: a propensity score analy- sis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018; 44(1): 185-191. 23. Artiles Medina A. Comparison of manage- ment strategies for low-risk prostate cancer patients. SIU Academy. [Internet]. [citado 16-01-2022]. Disponible en: https://academy. s i u - u r o l o g y. o r g / s i u / 2 0 2 0 / 4 0 t h - S I U - Vi r - tual/310268/alberto.del.cristo.artiles.medina. comparison.of.management.strategies.for.html ?f=menu%3D14%2Abrowseby%3D8%2Asortby %3D2%2Amedia%3D2%2Aspeaker%3D808220 24. Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Can- cer. Uroweb [Internet]. [citado el 15-01-2022]. Disponible en: https://uroweb.org/guidelines/ muscle-invasive-and-metastatic-bladder-can- cer 25. Martin C, West JM, Palermo S et al. Elderly patients undergoing cystectomy, comparing preoperative American Society of Anesthesio- logy and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scores and operative approaches. Urologia. 2019 ;86(4): 183-188. 26. Lin WY, Wu CT, Chen MF, Chang YH, Lin CL, Kao CH. Cystectomy for bladder cancer in el- derly patients is not associated with increased 30- and 90-day mortality or readmission, length of stay, and cost: Propensity score matching using a population database. Cancer Manag Res. 2018; 10: 1413-1418. 27. Young MJ, Elmussareh M, Weston P, Doolde- niya M. Radical cystectomy in the elderly - Is this a safe treatment option? Arab J Urol. 2017; 15(4): 360-365. 28. Fonteyne V, Ost P, Bellmunt J et al. Curative treatment for muscle invasive bladder cancer in elderly patients: a systematic review. Eur Urol. 2018; 73(1): 40-50. 29. Artiles Medina A. Radical cystectomy in elderly patients: postoperative complications and on- cological outcomes. SIU Academy [Internet] [citado 16-01-2022]. Disponible en: https:// academy.siu-urology.org/siu/2020/40th-SIU- Virtual/309954/alberto.del.cristo.artiles.medi- na.radical.cystectomy.in.elderly.patients.html? f=menu%3D14%2Abrowseby%3D8%2Asortby %3D2%2Amedia%3D2%2Aspeaker%3D808220 30. Prayer Galetti T, Soligo M, Morlacco A et al. Morbidity, mortality, and quality assessment fo- llowing open radical cystectomy in elderly pa- tients with bladder cancer. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021; 33(4): 1049–1061. 31. Izquierdo L, Peri L, Leon P et al. The role of cystectomy in elderly patients - a multicentre analysis. BJU Int. 2015; 116(Suppl 3): 73-79. 32. Horlemann B, Würnschimmel C, Hoeh B et al. Radical cystectomy vs. radiotherapy in urothe- lial bladder cancer in elderly and very elderly patients. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2022; 20(1): 93.e1-93.e9 33. Mehralivand S, Thomas C, Hampel C, Thüroff JW, Roos FC. Renal function in the elderly af- ter radical tumor nephrectomy and partial nephrectomy. Urologe A. 2012; 51(10): 1375- 1380. 34. Sirithanaphol W, Pachirat K, Rompsaithong U, Kiatsopit P, Ungareevittaya P, Chinda- prasirt J. Perioperative outcomes in elderly patients undergoing nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Res reports Urol. 2019; 11: 195-199. 35. An JY, Ball MW, Gorin MA et al. Partial vs radical nephrectomy for t1-t2 renal masses in the elderly: comparison of complications, renal function, and oncologic outcomes. Uro- logy. 2017; 100: 151-157. 36. Hsu RCJ, Barclay M, Loughran MA, Lyratzo- poulos G, Gnanapragasam VJ, Armitage JN. Time trends in service provision and survival outcomes for patients with renal cancer trea- ted by nephrectomy in England 2000-2010. BJU Int. 2018; 122(4): 599–609. 37. Peyton CC, Rothberg MB, Jiang V, Heavner MG, Hemal AK. Comparative analysis of re- nal functional outcomes and overall survival of elderly vs nonelderly patients undergoing radical nephrectomy. J Endourol. 2017; 31(2): 198–203. 38. O’Malley RL, Hayn MH, Hellenthal NJ, Kim HL, Underwood W, Schwaab T. Safety and outcomes of surgical treatment of renal cell carcinoma in the elderly. Can J Urol. 2012; 19(1): 6111-6117. 39. Roos FC, Brenner W, Albert C, Müller M, Thüroff JW, Hampel C. Perioperative morbi- dity and renal function in young and elderly patients undergoing elective nephron-sparing surgery or radical nephrectomy for renal tu- mours larger than 4 cm. BJU Int. 2011; 107(4): 554-561. 40. Vartolomei MD, Matei DV, Renne G et al. Long-term oncologic and functional outco- mes after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in elderly patients. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2019; 71(1): 31-37. 41. Gao X, Hu L, Pan Y, Zheng L. Surgical outco- mes of nephrectomy for elderly patients with renal cell carcinoma. Pakistan J Med Sci. 2018; 34(2): 288-293. 42. Mir MC, Pavan N, Capitanio U et al. Partial versus radical nephrectomy in very elderly patients: a propensity score analysis of surgi- cal, functional and oncologic outcomes (RE- SURGE project). World J Urol. 2020; 38(1): 151-158. 43. Veccia A, Dell’Oglio P, Antonelli A et al. Ro- botic partial nephrectomy versus radical ne- phrectomy in elderly patients with large re- nal masses. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2020; 72(1): 99–108. 44. Bertolo R, Garisto J, Armanyous S, Agudelo J, Lioudis M, Kaouk J. Perioperative, onco- logical and functional outcomes after ro- botic partial nephrectomy vs. cr yoablation in the elderly : a propensity score matched analysis. Urol Oncol. 2019; 37(4): 294.e9- 294.e15.