Anales de la RANM

184 A N A L E S R A N M R E V I S T A F U N D A D A E N 1 8 7 9 PRECISIÓN DIAGNÓSTICA DE LA ECOGRAFÍA FRENTE A LA RESONANCIA MAGNÉTICA Baracaldo Silva CM, et al. An RANM. 2022;139(02): 174 - 185 3. Darby SC, Kan SW, Spooner RJ, Giangrande PLF, Hill FGH, Hay CRM, et al. Mortality rates, life expectancy, and causes of death in people with hemophilia A or B in the United King- dom who were not infected with HIV. Blood. 2007;110(3):815–825. 4. Soucie JM, Nuss R, Evatt B, Abdelhak A, Cowan L, Hill H, et al. Mortality among males with he- mophilia: relations with source of medical care. The Hemophilia Surveillance System Project Investigators. Blood . 2000;96(2):437–442. 5. Wang SX, Guan Y, Nie YB, Li HY, Sun BY, Wang XY, et al. [Retrospectively analysis of the di- fference of bleeding frequency and hemophilic arthropathy between hemophilia A and hemo- philia B patients]. Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi . 2017;38(5):404–409. 6. Graveleau J, Trossaërt M, Leux C, Masseau A, Ternisien C, Néel A, et al. [Acquired hemophi- lia A. A monocentric retrospective study of 39 patients]. Rev Med Interne. 2013;34(1):4–11. 7. Sachdeva A, Gunasekaran V, Ramya HN, Dass J, Kotwal J, Seth T, et al. Consensus Statement of the Indian Academy of Pediatrics in Diagnosis and Management of Hemophilia. Indian Pedia- tr. 2018;55(7):582–590. 8. Lambert T, Auerswald G, Benson G, Hedner U, Jiménez-Yuste V, Ljung R, et al. Joint di- sease, the hallmark of haemophilia: What is- sues and challenges remain despite the deve- lopment of effective therapies? Thromb Res. 2014;133(6):967–971. 9. Magalhães AF, de Oliveira LCO, Pitella FA, Wi- chert-Ana L, Engel EE, Barbieri CH. Yttrium-90 radiosynovectomy in knees and ankles (25 joints in 22 hemophilic patients): Short-term results. Hematol Transfus Cell Ther. 2020; en prensa https://doi.org/10.1016/j.htct.2019.11.001. 10. Forsyth AL, Rivard GE, Valentino A, Zourikian N, Hoffman M, Monahan PE, et al. Consequen- ces of intra-articular bleeding in haemophilia: Science to clinical practice and beyond. Haemo- ph. 2012;18(Suppl 4):112–119. 11. Hooiveld MJJ, Roosendaal G, Vianen ME, van den Berg HM, Bijlsma JWJ, Lafeber FPJG. Im- mature articular cartilage is more susceptible to blood-induced damage than mature articu- lar cartilage: An in vivo animal study. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48(2):396–403. 12. Jelbert A, Vaidya S, Fotiadis N. Imaging and staging of haemophilic arthropathy. Clin Ra- diol. 2009;64(11):1119–1128. 13. García-Massó X, Ye-Lin Y, Garcia-Casado J, Querol F, Gonzalez LM. Assessment of haemo- philic arthropathy through balance analysis: A promising tool. Comput Methods Biomech Bio- med Engin. 2019;22(4):418–425. 14. Acharya SS. Advances in hemophilia and the role of current and emerging prophylaxis. Am J Manag Care. 2016;22(Suppl 5):s116–125. 15. Forsyth AL, Zourikian N, Valentino LA, Rivard GE. The effect of cooling on coagulation and haemostasis: Should «Ice» be part of treatment of acute haemarthrosis in haemophilia? Haemo- ph. 2012;18(6):843–850. 16. Ng WH, Chu WCW, Shing MK, Lam WWM, Chik KW, Li CK, et al. Role of imaging in mana- gement of hemophilic patients. AJR Am J Roent- genol. 2005;184(5):1619–1623. 17. Kilkoyne RF, Nuss R. Radiological assessment of haemophilic arthropathy with emphasis on MRI findings. Haemoph. 2003;9(Suppl 1):57– 63. 18. Bernabeu D, Martín, C. Sonography in haemo- philic joints. En: Rodríguez-Merchán EC, edi- tor. The Haemophilic Joints: New perspectives . Londres: Wiley-Blackwell Publishers; 2003. cap. 6. PROTOCOLO HEAD-US Martinoli C et al. Development and definition of a simpli- fie scanning procedure and scoring method for Haemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with Ultrasound (HEAD-US). Thromb Haemost. 2013;109(6):1170–1179. 19. de la Corte-Rodríguez H et al. The value of HEAD-US system in detecting subclinical ab- normalities in joints of patients in hemophilia. Expert Rev Hematol. 2018;11(3):253–261. 20. Plut D, Kotnik BF, Zupan IP, Kljucevsek D, Vid- mar G, Snoj Z, Martinoli C, Salapura V. Diag- nostic accuracy of haemophilia early arthro- pathy detection with ultrasound (HEAD-US): a comparative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study. Radiol Oncol. 2019 Jun 1;53(2):178-186. doi: 10.2478/raon-2019-0027. PMID: 31194690; PMCID: PMC6572497. 21. Aznar JA et al. Ultrasonography in the moni- toring of management of haemarthrosis. Hae- mophilia 2011; 17(5):0. doi:10.1111/j.1365- 2516.201102538.x 22. Jiménez-Yuste V, Álvarez-Román MT, Martín- Salces M, de la Corte-Rodríguez H, Altisent C, Parra R, et al. Joint status in Spanish haemophi- lia B patients assessed using the Haemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with Ultrasound (HEAD-US) score. Haemoph. 2019;25(1):144– 153. 23. Martinoli C, della Casa Alberighi O, Di Min- no G, Graziano E, Molinari AC, Pasta G, et al. Development and definition of a simplifie scanning procedure and scoring method for Haemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with Ultrasound (HEAD-US). Thromb Haemost. 2013;109(6):1170–1179. 24. Lundin B et al. A new magnetic resonance ima- ging scoring method for assessment of hae- mophilic arthropathy. Haemophilia. 2004 Jul; 10(4):383-389. 25. Zaffagnini S et al. Patellofemoral anatomy and biomechanics: current concepts. Joints 2013;1(2):15–20. Galland O, Walch G, Dejour H, Carret JP. An anatomical and radiological study of the femoropatellar articulation. Surg Radiol Anat. 1990;12(2):119–125. 26. Kirby AB et al. Magnetic resonance imaging findings of chronic lateral ankle instability. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2005;34(5):196–203. 27. De Maeseneer M et al. The imaging findings of impingement syndromes of the lower limb. Clin Radiol. 2017;72(12):1014–1024. 28. Kidder W et al. Point-of-care musculoskeletal ultrasound is critical for the diagnosis of hemar- throses, inflammation and soft tissue abnorma- lities in adult patients with painful haemophilic arthropathy. Haemoph. 2015;21(4):530–537.

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy ODI4MTE=