Anales de la RANM

189 A N A L E S R A N M R E V I S T A F U N D A D A E N 1 8 7 9 MEDIOS DE CONTRASTE ECOGRÁFICOS Picó R, et al. An RANM. 2025;142(02): 180 - 190 BIBLIOGRAFÍA 1. Gramiak R, Shah PM. Echocardiography of the aortic root. Invest Radiol. 1968; 3(5):356– 366. 2. Chong WK, Papadopoulou V, Dayton PA. Imaging with ultrasound contrast agents: cu- rrent status and future. Abdom Radiol N Y. 2018 Apr;43(4):762–72. 3. Tarighatnia A, Fouladi MR, Nader ND, Agha- nejad A, Ghadiri H. Recent trends of contrast agents in ultrasound imaging: a review of the classifications and applications. Mater Adv. 2022 May 11;3(9):3726–41. 4. Yang Z, Lv M, Yu Z, Sang L, Yang M, Tang R, et al. A bibliometric analysis of contrast- enhanced ultrasound over the past twenty years. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Aug 1;14(8):5555570–5555570. 5. Frinking P, Segers T, Luan Y, Tranquart F. Three Decades of Ultrasound Contrast Agents: A Review of the Past, Present and Future Improvements. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2020 Apr;46(4):892–908. 6. Stride E, Saffari N. Microbubble ultrasound contrast agents: a review. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H]. 2003;217(6):429–47. 7. Greco A, Mancini M, Gargiulo S, Graman- zini M, Claudio PP, Brunetti A, et al. Ul- trasound biomicroscopy in small animal research: applications in molecular and preclinical imaging. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012;2012:519238. 8. Calliada F, Campani R, Bottinelli O, Bozzi- ni A, Sommaruga MG. Ultrasound contrast agents: basic principles. Eur J Radiol. 1998 May;27 Suppl 2:S157-160. 9. Wilson SR, Greenbaum LD, Goldberg BB. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound: what is the evidence and what are the obstacles? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Jul;193(1):55–60. 10. Jakobsen JA, Oyen R, Thomsen HS, Mor- cos SK, Members of Contrast Media Sa- fety Committee of European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR). Safety of ul- trasound contrast agents. Eur Radiol. 2005 May ;15(5):941–5. 11. Parker JM, Weller MW, Feinstein LM, Adams RJ, Main ML, Grayburn PA, et al. Safety of ultrasound contrast agents in patients with known or suspected cardiac shunts. Am J Car- diol. 2013 Oct 1;112(7):1039–45. 12. Mandai M, Koda M, Matono T, Nagahara T, Sugihara T, Ueki M, et al. Assessment of he- patocellular carcinoma by contrast-enhanced ultrasound with perfluorobutane microbub- bles: comparison with dynamic CT. Br J Ra- diol. 2011 Jun;84(1002):499–507 13. Back SJ, Acharya PT, Bellah RD, Cohen HL, Darge K, Deganello A, et al. Contrast- enhanced ultrasound of the kidneys and adrenals in children. Pediatr Radiol. 2021 Nov;51(12):2198–213. 14. Dietrich CF, Nolsøe CP, Barr RG, Berzigot- ti A, Burns PN, Cantisani V, et al. Guideli- nes and Good Clinical Practice Recommen- dations for Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Liver-Update 2020 WFUMB in Cooperation with EFSUMB, AFSUMB, AIUM, and FLAUS. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2020 Oct;46(10):2579–604. 15. Pang EHT, Chan A, Ho SG, Harris AC. Con- trast-Enhanced Ultrasound of the Liver: Op- timizing Technique and Clinical Applications. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Feb;210(2):320– 32 16. Kazmierski B, Deurdulian C, Tchelepi H, Grant EG. Applications of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the kidney. Abdom Radiol N Y. 2018 Apr;43(4):880–98. 17. Sidhu PS, Cantisani V, Dietrich CF, Gilja OH, Saftoiu A, Bartels E, et al. The EFSUMB Gui- delines and Recommendations for the Cli- nical Practice of Contrast-Enhanced Ultra- sound (CEUS) in Non-Hepatic Applications: Update 2017 (Short Version). Ultraschall Med Stuttg Ger. 2018 Apr 1;39(2):154–80. 18. Cantisani V, Bertolotto M, Clevert DA, Co- rreas JM, Drudi FM, Fischer T, et al. EFSUMB 2020 Proposal for a Contrast-Enhanced Ul- trasound-Adapted Bosniak Cyst Categoriza- tion - Position Statement. Ultraschall Med Stuttg Ger 1980. 2021 Apr;42(2):154–66. 19. Jacobsen N, Pietersen PI, Nolsoe C, Kon- ge L, Graumann O, Laursen CB. Clinical Applications of Contrast-Enhanced Tho- racic Ultrasound (CETUS) Compared to Standard Reference Tests: A Systematic Re- view. Ultraschall Med Stuttg Ger 1980. 2022 Feb;43(1):72–81. 20. Davidson BP, Hodovan J, Mason OR, Moc- cetti F, Gupta A, Muller M, et al. Limb Per- fusion During Exercise Assessed by Contrast Ultrasound Varies According to Symptom Severity in Patients with Peripheral Arter y Disease. J Am Soc Echocardiogr Off Publ Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2019 Sep;32(9):1086- 1094.e3. 21. Ntoulia A, Barnewolt CE, Doria AS, Ho-Fung VM, Lorenz N, Mentzel HJ, et al. Contrast- enhanced ultrasound for musculoskeletal in- dications in children. Pediatr Radiol. 2021 Nov;51(12):2303–23. 22. Chen SY, Wang YW, Chen WS, Hsiao MY. Update of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in Musculoskeletal Medicine: Clinical Perspec- tives – A Reviewx. J Med Ultrasound. 2023 Jun;31(2):92 23. Dietrich CF, Augustiniene R, Batko T, Canti- sani V, Cekuolis A, Deganello A, et al. Euro- pean Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB): An Up- date on the Pediatric CEUS Registry on Be- half of the “EFSUMB Pediatric CEUS Registry Working Group.” Ultraschall Med Stuttg Ger 1980. 2021 Jun;42(3):270–7. 24. Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhan- ced ultrasound in traumatic solid organ inju- ries in children: a systematic review and me- ta-analysis | Pediatric Radiology [Internet]. [cited 2025 Apr 4]. Available from: https:// link.spr inger.com/ar t icle/10.1007/s00247- 024-06127-9.